Re: Time to move pg_test_timing to measure in nanoseconds

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to move pg_test_timing to measure in nanoseconds
Date: 2023-03-26 22:05:44
Message-ID: CAMT0RQSBEW3A-+M3fNvHarEXMu8ET3AuVd9bbK=+F_AWvDEhAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sure, will do.

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 11:40 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-03-26 16:43:21 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Currently pg_test_timing utility measures its timing overhead in
> > microseconds, giving results like this
>
> I have a patch that does that and a bit more that's included in a larger
> patchset by David Geier:
> https://postgr.es/m/198ef658-a5b7-9862-2017-faf85d59e3a8%40gmail.com
>
> Could you review that part of the patchset?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-03-26 22:12:26 Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2023-03-26 21:54:05 Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session