Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?
Date: 2025-07-06 18:22:25
Message-ID: CAMT0RQR1FEtVK5vw9uvaLJfXb_OSjpfnruZWv+2i=hRQ8r-q+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here is the latest patch with documentation only for the utility
itself. Old general discussion moved to PostgreSQL Wiki with link to
it in "See Also " section

Also added a flag to select number of direct values to show

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 11:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> writes:
> > Did I understand correctly that you would prefer the documentation part to
> > be much smaller than it is now and all current the discussion about things
> > that are not strictly about the pg_test_timing to be not in the docs for it
> > ?
>
> Well, I would like for the docs not to readily get stale again.
> I don't foresee us maintaining this page better in future than
> we have so far.
>
> > My current plan is to move the other discussions around timing from th
> > edocs to PostgreSQL Wiki.
>
> That could work.
>
> regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-added-option-to-select-number-of-direct-values-to.patch text/x-patch 18.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-07-06 18:26:49 Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade
Previous Message Noah Misch 2025-07-06 18:07:11 Re: Issues with 2PC at recovery: CLOG lookups and GlobalTransactionData