From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? |
Date: | 2025-07-07 21:38:29 |
Message-ID: | 584311.1751924309@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> writes:
> Here is the latest patch with documentation only for the utility
> itself. Old general discussion moved to PostgreSQL Wiki with link to
> it in "See Also " section
Thanks for continuing to work on this!
> Also added a flag to select number of direct values to show
Hmm ... I agree with having a way to control the length of that output,
but I don't think that specifying a count is the most useful way to
do it. Particularly with a default of only 10, it seems way too
likely to cut off important information.
What do you think of instead specifying the limit as the maximum
running-percentage to print, with a default of say 99.99%? That
gives me results like
Observed timing durations up to 99.9900%:
ns % of total running % count
15 4.5452 4.5452 8313178
16 58.3785 62.9237 106773354
17 33.6840 96.6078 61607584
18 3.1151 99.7229 5697480
19 0.2638 99.9867 482570
20 0.0093 99.9960 17054
In the attached I also made it print the largest observed
duration, which seems like it might be useful information.
As previously threatened, I also added a test case to
improve the code coverage.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-pg_test_timing-nanoseconds.patch | text/x-diff | 20.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2025-07-07 22:02:17 | Re: Can can I make an injection point wait occur no more than once? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-07-07 21:31:30 | Can can I make an injection point wait occur no more than once? |