| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergey Sargsyan <sergey(dot)sargsyan(dot)2001(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements |
| Date: | 2025-11-28 17:58:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAMT0RQQP9JiGqqB+pVBzPT7unG1BMBuLj=kGPk4BeS3g6VyT1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 5:58 PM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
...
> I'm a bit worried, though, that LR may lose updates due to commit
> order differences between WAL and PGPROC. I don't know how that's
> handled in logical decoding, and can't find much literature about it
> in the repo either.
Now the reference to logical decoding made me think that maybe to real
fix for CIC would be to leverage logical decoding for the 2nd pass of
CIC and not wore about in-page visibilities at all.
---
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-11-28 18:00:29 | Re: pgsql: Inline pg_ascii_tolower() and pg_ascii_toupper(). |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2025-11-28 17:52:20 | Re: Periodic authorization expiration checks using GoAway message |