Re: What happened to jsonb's JENTRY_ISFIRST?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What happened to jsonb's JENTRY_ISFIRST?
Date: 2014-08-13 23:45:00
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTzXdUCcx8LY2MDCDwDDQKN6LJ=4QHmEXtbHzdPiEdEuQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If the bit is unused now, should we be worrying about reclaiming it for
> better use? Like say allowing jsonb's to be larger than just a quarter
> of the maximum datum size?

Commit d9daff0e0cb15221789e6c50d9733c8754c054fb removed it. This is an
obsolete comment.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J] 2014-08-14 00:20:19 Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-08-13 23:04:44 Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL