Re: What happened to jsonb's JENTRY_ISFIRST?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What happened to jsonb's JENTRY_ISFIRST?
Date: 2014-08-14 09:47:19
Message-ID: 53EC85A7.5010300@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/14/2014 02:45 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If the bit is unused now, should we be worrying about reclaiming it for
>> better use? Like say allowing jsonb's to be larger than just a quarter
>> of the maximum datum size?
>
> Commit d9daff0e0cb15221789e6c50d9733c8754c054fb removed it. This is an
> obsolete comment.

Yeah. I just noticed the same and replied in the other thread
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/53EC8194.4020804@vmware.com). Note
to self: check all the mails in inbox before replying..

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-08-14 11:34:09 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2014-08-14 09:45:53 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers