Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items
Date: 2015-05-14 22:03:36
Message-ID: CAM3SWZThpNKDk67Q6PGY1eD-rRYZ56uGY13RGbPzm1YLD0AcWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
>> to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
>> of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that
>> committing almost-ready patches at this stage of the game is a bad idea.)
>
> I think if there's any patch that deserves some leeway it's this
> one. It's been been forced into a limbo for nearly half a year; without
> leaving Andrew many options.

+1.

If Andres is going to try and find a way of getting the patch into
9.5, then I think he deserves at least a few extra days. It wasn't as
if Andrew wasn't all over this from early in the cycle.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-05-14 22:11:43 Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-05-14 21:54:17 Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items