From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: memory leak in e94568ecc10 (pre-reading in external sort) |
Date: | 2016-10-06 16:03:25 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTGkT_2B_3uG0n3XtDjTEY10QLrgkqUf8x4Vms3pODkxw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Besides, what I propose to do is really exactly the same as what you
> also want to do, except it avoids actually changing state->maxTapes.
> We'd just pass down what you propose to assign to state->maxTapes
> directly, which differs (and not just in the common case where there
> are inactive tapes -- it's always at least off-by-one). Right?
What I mean is that you should pass down numTapes alongside
numInputTapes. The function init_tape_buffers() could either have an
additional argument (numTapes), or derive numTapes itself.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Serge Rielau | 2016-10-06 16:12:23 | Re: Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-06 16:01:12 | Re: Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs |