Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date: 2015-05-08 19:00:35
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSqDaRG9c12XewsKqFLkNAak1kxie3UZ6+Wi9cC2UKT8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?

The candidates list is absolutely critical.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-05-08 19:05:42 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-08 18:59:22 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-05-08 19:05:42 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-08 18:59:22 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0