From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Date: | 2015-05-08 18:59:22 |
Message-ID: | 18313.1431111562@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I think Peter (on IM) just found a more likely explanation than mine.
> index_close(idxRel, NoLock);
> heap_close(relation, NoLock);
> candidates = lappend_oid(candidates, idxForm->indexrelid);
> ...
> Yes. idxForm points into idxRel->rd_index.
Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-08 19:00:35 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-08 18:50:48 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-08 19:00:35 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-08 18:51:46 | Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) |