Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Date: 2016-03-31 21:28:30
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSa-FZ878NvQw_QLsX9-Cr68+1Hd7+-iYxz=EN=3r9wRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Probably the most discussion-worthy item is whether we can say
> anything more about the strxfrm mess. Should we make a wiki
> page about that and have the release note item link to it?

I just noticed that the release notes mention char(n) as affected.
That's not actually true, because char(n) SortSupport only came in
9.6. The Wiki page now shows this, which may be the most important
place, but ideally we'd fix this in the release notes. I guess it's
too late.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-31 21:59:52 Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2016-03-31 21:13:46 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers