| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |
| Date: | 2013-07-08 18:59:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRn_dCJ86UTpm44+U1RhUmqxbRUsj1F25iaHu0D8Q+coA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, Tom opined in
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23249.1370878717@sss.pgh.pa.us that
> the current patch is okay. I have a mild opinion that it should instead
> print only SHR_LOCK when both bits are set, and one of the others when
> only one of them is set. But I don't have a strong opinion about this,
> and since Tom disagrees with me, feel free to exercise your own (Jeff's)
> judgement.
I'm inclined to agree with you here, but I suppose it isn't all that important.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-08 19:00:16 | Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2013-07-08 18:58:15 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |