Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Date: 2013-07-08 18:52:28
Message-ID: 20130708185228.GE18471@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan escribió:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> > I see this patch is still "waiting on author" in the CF. Is there
> > something else needed from me, or should we move this to "ready for
> > committer"?
>
> Well, obviously someone still needs to think through the handling of
> the infoMask bits.

Well, Tom opined in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23249.1370878717@sss.pgh.pa.us that
the current patch is okay. I have a mild opinion that it should instead
print only SHR_LOCK when both bits are set, and one of the others when
only one of them is set. But I don't have a strong opinion about this,
and since Tom disagrees with me, feel free to exercise your own (Jeff's)
judgement.

Tom's the only available committer in this case anyway. [Actually,
pgfoundry.org says it's a zero-people team in the pgfiledump project
right now, but I'm hoping that's just a temporary glitch.]

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Blackwell 2013-07-08 18:58:15 Re: [v9.4] row level security
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-07-08 18:50:24 Re: [PATCH] pgbench --throttle (submission 7 - with lag measurement)