| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 19:25:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRj3+k+RpYxctpvHzUMchSEQpWroBiRiTdxzsjUeTj2RQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I would be fine with adding a *compact* example of this kind to the
> table that begins section 8.14.3. I probably would not back-patch it,
> because the absence of that example is not an error in the
> documentation, but I will not complain if someone else does.
How about the attached? It's a compact refinement of my original
example of more complicated jsonb containment.
I still think it would be a good idea to go back to 9.4. I have reason
to believe that people are getting confused on this point.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jsonb_nested_containment_doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-10-29 19:29:05 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-10-29 19:24:52 | Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport |