| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 19:29:05 |
| Message-ID: | 56327381.5040108@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 10/28/15 4:18 AM, Victor Wagner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:25:57 -0400
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Also, this assumes that all the components other than host and port
>> are the same. Earlier there was a discussion about why the ports
>> would ever need to be different. Well, why can't the database names
>> be different? I could have use for that.
>
> Because of way postgresql replication is implemented.
There are multiple types of PostgreSQL replication, and there will be
others in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-29 19:33:07 | Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-29 19:25:48 | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-30 13:26:45 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Victor Wagner | 2015-10-28 08:18:39 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |