Re: [PATCH] Revive line type

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, rui hua <365507506hua(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revive line type
Date: 2013-10-03 12:20:50
Message-ID: CAM2+6=UQqUWOcY+Lb3AoT1Swz2=cO7_SmdH3mW-t+_ZGpjj2Dw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 14:26 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> > So no issues from my side.
> >
> > However, do we still need this in close_pl() ?
> >
> > #ifdef NOT_USED
> > if (FPeq(line->A, -1.0) && FPzero(line->B))
> > { /* vertical */
> > }
> > #endif
>
> No, that can be removed.
>

Will you please attach new patch with above block removed ? Then I will
quickly check that new patch and mark as "Ready For Committer".

>
> > Also close_sl, close_lb and dist_lb are NOT yet implemented. It will
> > be good if we have those. But I don't think we should wait for those
> > functions to be implemented.
>
> Right, those are separate projects.
>

Agree.

Thanks
--
Jeevan B Chalke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MauMau 2013-10-03 12:34:24 Re: 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-10-03 11:58:27 Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-09 05:14:20 Re: [PATCH] Revive line type
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-02 00:42:46 Re: [PATCH] Revive line type