From: | Steve M <sfmconsult(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2018-04-09 13:59:59 |
Message-ID: | CAM0HU6sz6wug0_-LB3FrXK2SKT9uQdE_GvYxbdPgvVcPAghgiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thank you for responding.
*Best regards,*
*Steve Maio*
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> >> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form <
> noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >> Should this not read :
> >> psql-f outfile postgres
>
> > Technically it is correct: you’re dumping data to an output file,
> > and reading the data in from an input file. The documentation
> > also makes reference to what the “outfile” and “infile” represent.
>
> > That being said, I can see how it can be confusing particularly
> > if you are reading through the documentation quickly. Perhaps
> > a name like “dumpfile” would be more clear?
>
> +1 ... I thought the same. Will go fix it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Salvador Jacinto | 2018-04-10 14:24:27 | Re: SSL : client configuration |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-08 20:21:54 | Re: Pg_dumpall |