| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | sfmconsult(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2018-04-08 20:21:54 |
| Message-ID: | 26637.1523218914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Should this not read :
>> psql-f outfile postgres
> Technically it is correct: you’re dumping data to an output file,
> and reading the data in from an input file. The documentation
> also makes reference to what the “outfile” and “infile” represent.
> That being said, I can see how it can be confusing particularly
> if you are reading through the documentation quickly. Perhaps
> a name like “dumpfile” would be more clear?
+1 ... I thought the same. Will go fix it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve M | 2018-04-09 13:59:59 | Re: Pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-04-08 17:01:39 | Re: Pg_dumpall |