Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats

From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date: 2023-03-20 20:01:02
Message-ID: CAM-w4HPcKgcnPHAiQv6-3cECAM0H0havP2N5qRYddvkqXhaRNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 04:58, Nitin Jadhav
<nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:
> > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs
>
> Thanks for sharing this. I have fixed this in the patch attached.

AFAICS this patch was marked Waiting on Author due to this feedback on
Feb 14 but the patch was updated Feb 19 and is still passing today.
I've marked it Needs Review.

I'm not sure if all of the feedback from Bharath Rupireddy and Kyotaro
Horiguchi was addressed.

If there's any specific questions remaining you need feedback on it
would be good to ask explicitly. Otherwise if you think it's ready you
could mark it Ready for Commit.

--
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 20:05:03 Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon
Previous Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 19:56:04 Re: Optimizing Node Files Support