Re: 2022-01 Commitfest

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2022-01 Commitfest
Date: 2022-02-02 17:09:06
Message-ID: CAM-w4HMcY7_7ab1QDofSZY0DBGj0SPmZwULkxgjAwqcSXNJObA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I gave two reviews and received one review but the patches have been
"Moved to next CF". Should I update them to "Returned with Feedback"
given they all did get feedback? I was under the impression "Moved to
next CF" was only for patches that didn't get feedback in a CF and
were still waiting for feedback.

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 11:16, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's now at least Feb. 1st anywhere on earth, so the commit fest is now over.
>
> Since last week 5 entries were committed, 1 withdrawn, 3 returned with
> feedback, 2 already moved to the next commitfest and 1 rejected.
>
> This gives a total of 211 patches still alive, most of them ready for the next
> and final pg15 commitfest.
>
> Status summary:
> - Needs review: 147.
> - Waiting on Author: 38.
> - Ready for Committer: 26.
> - Committed: 59.
> - Moved to next CF: 3.
> - Returned with Feedback: 5.
> - Rejected: 5.
> - Withdrawn: 9.
> - Total: 292.
>
> I will take care of closing the current commit fest and moving the entries to
> the next one shortly.
>
>

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Heiss 2022-02-02 17:23:18 Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS
Previous Message Greg Stark 2022-02-02 17:01:12 Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats