Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X

From: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Date: 2019-03-04 22:21:11
Message-ID: CALvqh4o-8-3NOrYkPA_RweSfMMT21pJ-70U0Qz6WgDB7ng4dLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi Justin

Does it mean that these functions are default and came with 9.2 ?
I am wondering how these functions are created in the DB as the
library($libdir/pg_reorg) is not exists in system

Note:
My schema name is reorg not pg_reorg

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 1:45 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:37:30PM -0800, Perumal Raj wrote:
> > I could see bunch of functions under reorg schema.
>
> Those functions are the ones preventing you from upgrading.
> You should drop schema pg_reorg cascade.
> You can run it in a transaction first to see what it will drop.
> But after the upgrade, you can CREATE EXTENSION pg_repack, which is a fork
> of
> pg_reorg, which is itself no longer maintained.
>
> Justin
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-03-04 22:32:21 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Previous Message Julie Nishimura 2019-03-04 21:59:13 master-> 2 hot standbys

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-03-04 22:32:21 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2019-03-04 22:20:39 Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation