| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X |
| Date: | 2019-03-04 22:32:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20190304223221.GQ29584@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 02:21:11PM -0800, Perumal Raj wrote:
> Does it mean that these functions are default and came with 9.2 ?
> I am wondering how these functions are created in the DB as the
> library($libdir/pg_reorg) is not exists in system
I don't think it's default.
But was probably installed by running some SQL script.
It tentatively sounds safe to me to drop, but you should take a backup and
inspect and double check your pg_dump output and output of "begin; drop schema
pgreorg cascade".
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben Chobot | 2019-03-05 01:08:04 | Re: master-> 2 hot standbys |
| Previous Message | Perumal Raj | 2019-03-04 22:21:11 | Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2019-03-04 22:33:47 | Patch to document base64 encoding |
| Previous Message | Perumal Raj | 2019-03-04 22:21:11 | Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X |