Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2019-07-30 13:00:46
Message-ID: CALtqXTcuJFurSjs8Sz6Lu=mWs4UapDvRS3kD1v_dHbNUhDKOcw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Paul,

I have rebased the patch to master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012)
and fixed some compilation warning. Now I am reviewing the actual code.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The patch requires to rebase on the master branch.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>

--
Ibrar Ahmed

Attachment Content-Type Size
temporal_pks_fks_v005.patch application/octet-stream 104.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-07-30 13:12:46 Re: Built-in connection pooler
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-07-30 12:36:45 Re: concerns around pg_lsn