Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2019-08-01 10:22:23
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJAYsxAkh48N2+VC1djaATqWna=ERouiLtXqdj6Er7Cmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have rebased the patch to master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012) and fixed some compilation warning. Now I am reviewing the actual code.

Thanks for doing that Ibrar. I think the right status for this CF
entry is now: Needs review. I have set it that way, in the September
CF. By the way, there are some test failures:

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.50280

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-08-01 10:24:54 Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-08-01 10:13:24 Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible