Re: postgres_fdw: Obsolete comments in GetConnection()

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: Obsolete comments in GetConnection()
Date: 2021-10-06 11:38:56
Message-ID: CALj2ACX6x7FNd_Ddc+RdsPN4ZDA6oe9UP77uH6zBGe6unvde-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 4:55 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bharath,
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:37 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > +1 for rewording the comments. Here are my thoughts on the patch:
> >
> > 1) Just to be consistent(we are using this word in the error message,
> > and in other comments around there), how about
> > + * Determine whether to try to reestablish the connection.
> > instead of
> > + * Determine whether to try to remake the connection later.
>
> Actually, we use the word “remake” as well in comments in
> connection.c: e.g., “If the connection needs to be *remade* due to
> invalidation, disconnect as soon as we're out of all transactions.” in
> GetConnection(). But I don’t have a strong opinion about that, so
> I’ll change the word as proposed.

Thanks.

> > 2) Just to be consistent, how about
> > + * cases where we're starting new transaction (not subtransaction),
> > if a broken connection is
> > instead of
> > + * cases where we're out of all transactions, if a broken connection is
>
> Actually, I modified the comment to match existing comments like the
> one mentioned above. I think the patch would actually be more
> consistent.

Okay.

> > 3) IMO we don't need the word "later" here because we are immediately
> > reestablishing the connection, if it is decided to do so.
> > + * Determine whether to try to remake the connection later.
>
> Ok, I’ll drop the word “later”.

Thanks.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-10-06 11:53:57 Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-10-06 11:33:22 Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests