Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM
Date: 2026-09-08 17:23:52
Message-ID: CALj2ACWMYe=-fbKYNbXw0trjqBBUy6tDbdAewtaOVQ--v23+aQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 4:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I attached the updated patch. Please review it.
>
> The v4 patch looks good to me. pgindent and tests are happy.

Please find the attached v5 patch containing detail instead of hint
and also consistent wording as discussed here:
https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXyTPZEcGeKgHQjtSCScOOLpHNhAdH3Cn2T48aXg2LZfA%40mail.gmail.com

--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Restrict-REPACK-CONCURRENTLY-to-the-heap-access-m.patch application/octet-stream 2.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Burd 2026-09-08 17:28:22 ExecForceStoreHeapTuple() loses tts_tid, so ORDER BY-op index scans project an invalid ctid
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-09-08 17:13:57 Re: convert various variables to atomics