Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM
Date: 2026-09-08 18:54:40
Message-ID: CAD21AoCqcNehmhYwP23OyZcMM=vAp9h8JLi-=3Esr2ojFnqcRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 10:24 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 4:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > I attached the updated patch. Please review it.
> >
> > The v4 patch looks good to me. pgindent and tests are happy.
>
> Please find the attached v5 patch containing detail instead of hint
> and also consistent wording as discussed here:
> https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXyTPZEcGeKgHQjtSCScOOLpHNhAdH3Cn2T48aXg2LZfA%40mail.gmail.com

Thank you for updating the patch. It looks good to me so I've pushed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2026-09-08 18:57:12 Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) rewrites tables marked with user_catalog_table
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-09-08 18:54:14 Re: FOR PORTION OF bugs