Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files
Date: 2020-07-13 11:34:45
Message-ID: CALj2ACUNRQCXrqJAo-O2BhE3=nTbVqWSnR3GZ-8iCLKAkhXsiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > > CopyReadFromRawBuf as a name for the new function might be misleading
> > > as long as we are only using it for binary data. Maybe
> > > CopyReadBinaryData is more appropriate? See attached v4 with these
> > > and a few other cosmetic changes.
> > >
> >
> > CopyReadBinaryData() looks meaningful. +1.
>
> Okay, thanks. Let's have a committer take a look at this then?
>

I think yes, unless someone has any more points/review comments.
Accordingly the status in the commitfest can be changed.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-07-13 11:51:42 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-13 11:23:00 Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication