| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files |
| Date: | 2020-07-13 07:34:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqE3RwGpnQzJfbS=TktWCH39HG+530T=C=Bbpa7CVAg2zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:17 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > CopyReadFromRawBuf as a name for the new function might be misleading
> > as long as we are only using it for binary data. Maybe
> > CopyReadBinaryData is more appropriate? See attached v4 with these
> > and a few other cosmetic changes.
> >
>
> CopyReadBinaryData() looks meaningful. +1.
Okay, thanks. Let's have a committer take a look at this then?
--
Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-07-13 07:40:25 | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-07-13 07:01:11 | Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments |