Re: [PG19] pg_upgrade --check passes, then the upgrade fails

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PG19] pg_upgrade --check passes, then the upgrade fails
Date: 2026-10-30 05:44:00
Message-ID: CALdSSPiJLn=_HS2d4pWAqETxDq9VEfwHRGDKCkhQ_fb78Dgc3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 at 07:27, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kirill,
>
> Thanks for reviewing v4 and for the PoC.
>
> I think the lz4 and zstd cases are not new in 19. 18 to 18 fails the same way
> when the new build has no lz4 or zstd.
>
> I want to limit this thread for pg19 regression, maybe your patch can target 20?

Yes, my bad, I didn't read the thread carefully. Let's continue on
some other v20 thread, is there any already?

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yilin Zhang 2026-10-30 06:03:00 Re: bug: query returns different result with and without memoization.
Previous Message solai v 2026-10-30 05:36:24 Re: PSQL - improve tab completion for pub/sub options