Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Date: 2020-11-23 09:17:37
Message-ID: CALT9ZEHXkdbDCd+3ZZbntmgZQbf2PvjAqp_qo6CdkcDKwQGPhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The wording seems no problem to me. I looked into a patch and changes
>> also seem sensible but I can not apply this patch because of really many
>> rejects. Which commit should I use to apply it onto?
>
> Sorry, the rejects were due to my git configuration. I will apply and make
the final checks soon.

--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 曾文旌 2020-11-23 09:27:20 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-11-23 09:17:13 Re: Split copy.c