Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql

From: Dinesh Chemuduru <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)migops(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql
Date: 2021-12-03 11:15:27
Message-ID: CALGdMEPWr_aJnRtjX1K0LvfJGUQT1t9myRB0JqWLXjp25yyryw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael,

Attaching the latest patch here(It's the recent patch), and looking for
more suggestions/inputs from the team.

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:09, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:58:58PM +0530, Dinesh Chemuduru wrote:
> > The proposed statements are much clear, but will wait for other’s
> > suggestion, and will fix it accordingly.
>
> This update was three weeks ago, and no new version has been
> provided, so I am marking this as returned with feedback in the CF
> app. If you can work more on this proposal and send an updated patch,
> please feel free to resubmit.
> --
> Michael
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
05_diag_parse_sql_statement.patch application/octet-stream 12.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2021-12-03 11:30:18 Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-12-03 09:56:46 Re: parallel vacuum comments