Re: parallel vacuum comments

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: parallel vacuum comments
Date: 2021-12-03 09:56:46
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lz8qvYg5DYc3EY0GtxxOagTb66Nram4XQjLyp3jkY7og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:01 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached updated patches.
> >
>
> I have a few comments on v4-0001.
>

The new test proposed by v4-0003 is increasing the vacuum_parallel.sql
timing by more than 10 times. It appears to be taking the highest time
among all the tests in make check. I think it is because of a large
amount of data being processed by the test. I think it is good to use
it for testing of patches during development but won't be a good idea
to commit. Can we reduce its timings?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dinesh Chemuduru 2021-12-03 11:15:27 Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-12-03 09:51:48 Re: Logical replication - schema change not invalidating the relation cache