Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql

From: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
To: Dinesh Chemuduru <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)migops(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql
Date: 2021-12-03 16:35:58
Message-ID: CALNJ-vQMFZvX64jV2K8r+TmW3JEpR8gbmYJTV=wK2LsKKb=giw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:15 AM Dinesh Chemuduru <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)migops(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Attaching the latest patch here(It's the recent patch), and looking for
> more suggestions/inputs from the team.
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:09, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:58:58PM +0530, Dinesh Chemuduru wrote:
>> > The proposed statements are much clear, but will wait for other’s
>> > suggestion, and will fix it accordingly.
>>
>> This update was three weeks ago, and no new version has been
>> provided, so I am marking this as returned with feedback in the CF
>> app. If you can work more on this proposal and send an updated patch,
>> please feel free to resubmit.
>> --
>> Michael
>>
> Hi,

+int
+set_errquery(const char *query)

Since the return value is ignored, the return type can be void.

Cheers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Zubkov 2021-12-03 16:55:53 Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-03 16:29:41 Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions