| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
| Date: | 2023-01-04 07:07:59 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm3Z0sti4R7PuD0npA7tQoWRwK8dAh=QxWf+nU0ZGC=_Ww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 13:47, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 08.12.22 03:30, Peter Smith wrote:
> > PSA patches for v9*
> >
> > v9-0001 - Now the table rows are ordered per PeterE's suggestions [1]
>
> committed
>
> > v9-0002 - All the review comments from DavidJ [2] are addressed
>
> I'm not sure about this one. It removes the "see [link] for details"
> phrases and instead makes the view name a link. I think this loses the
> cue that there is more information elsewhere. Otherwise, one could
> think that, say, the entry about pg_stat_activity is the primary source
> and the link just links to itself. Also keep in mind that people use
> media where links are not that apparent (PDF), so the presence of a link
> by itself cannot be the only cue about the flow of the information.
I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
pending, please post an updated patch for the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2023-01-04 07:09:23 | Re: Add SHELL_EXIT_CODE to psql |
| Previous Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-01-04 06:58:00 | Ignore dropped columns when checking the column list in logical replication |