Re: Addition of alias types regpublication and regsubscription

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Addition of alias types regpublication and regsubscription
Date: 2021-05-31 13:37:04
Message-ID: CALDaNm0jz+n6nG_kepqRxEKHdtJmViWBqTL1QpfCCcnTY2ZUfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 9:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I felt inclusion of alias types regpublication and regsubscription will
> > help the logical replication users.
>
> This doesn't really seem worth the trouble --- how often would you
> use these?
>
> If we had a policy of inventing reg* aliases for every kind of catalog
> object, that'd be one thing, but we don't. (And the overhead in
> inventing new object kinds is already high enough, so I'm not in favor
> of creating such a policy.)

ok, Thanks for considering this.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-31 13:44:14 Re: why is the permission granted in a non-recursive way and what are the benefits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-31 13:36:20 Re: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode