Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-07-31 17:05:02
Message-ID: CALDaNm0QkzJ7Tngf-n5Mf6mczHLoRTPpqMy7m3T6f774rQQ6fA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Here, the test is expecting 2 prepared transactions corresponding to
> > two subscriptions but it waits for just one subscription via
> > appname_copy. It should wait for the second subscription using
> > $appname as well.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I agree with this analysis. The test needs to wait for both
> subscriptions to catch up.
> Attached is a patch that addresses this issue.

The changes look good to me.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-07-31 17:53:02 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-07-31 16:10:44 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early