Re: CoC [Final]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
wrote:

> On 21 January 2016 at 10:37, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than
> > formulation.
>
> Then make it explicit.
>
> * Disruption of the collaborative space, or patterns of behaviour
> which the majority of the core team consider to be harassment, will
> not be tolerated.
>
> (I've depersonalised the sentence also, to make it clear that it's the
> action and not the actor that is not tolerated)
>
> > Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far
> > better than the alternative.
>
> It's better to let the baying crowd decide your fate rather than
> codifying acceptable behaviour?
>
> The Dark Ages called, they want their Justice model back :)
>

Resisting the urge to talk about how justice was actually seen in the Dark
Ages....

But seriously, I think human judgment is better than a code which those who
want to cause problems can and will use as a weapon against the rest.

>
> Geoff
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more