Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables

From: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
Date: 2021-04-21 23:30:52
Message-ID: CAKkQ509oi7kHF-=puviM6RJ3b66ZfBOfn9khnJkR2j2ER=XgmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thank you for discussing this item.

> I think we should treat ATTACH/
> DETACH/DROP handling as a further feature to be added in a future
> release, not an open item to be fixed in the current one.
>
I agree with your opinion.

> Now, if somebody sees a very trivial way to handle it, let's discuss it,
> but *I* don't see it.
>
I started thinking about the way to handle ATTACH/DETACH/DROP,
but I haven't created patches. If no one has done it yet, I'll keep working.

--
Best regards,
Yuzuko Hosoya
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-22 00:55:29 pgsql: doc: Move parallel_leader_participation to its correct category
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-04-21 23:06:49 Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-21 23:51:35 Re: decoupling table and index vacuum
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-04-21 23:22:33 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)