From: | yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables |
Date: | 2021-04-21 23:30:52 |
Message-ID: | CAKkQ509oi7kHF-=puviM6RJ3b66ZfBOfn9khnJkR2j2ER=XgmQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Thank you for discussing this item.
> I think we should treat ATTACH/
> DETACH/DROP handling as a further feature to be added in a future
> release, not an open item to be fixed in the current one.
>
I agree with your opinion.
> Now, if somebody sees a very trivial way to handle it, let's discuss it,
> but *I* don't see it.
>
I started thinking about the way to handle ATTACH/DETACH/DROP,
but I haven't created patches. If no one has done it yet, I'll keep working.
--
Best regards,
Yuzuko Hosoya
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-22 00:55:29 | pgsql: doc: Move parallel_leader_participation to its correct category |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-04-21 23:06:49 | Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-04-21 23:51:35 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-04-21 23:22:33 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |