Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2017-09-05 11:55:03
Message-ID: CAKcux6=aPQbPScsA-8v7cD=yjNOGWAnvEnJ1cQ6zNjoWH30jEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> I have fixed the issues which were marked as TODOs in the attached
> patches. Also, I have included your test change patch in my series of
> patches. Are there any other issues you have commented out?
>
> Thanks Ashutosh, All commented issue got fixed. I am working on some
combinations of N-way joins
to test partition matching, will send those as well once done.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-09-05 11:57:20 Re: Replacing lfirst() with lfirst_node() appropriately in planner.c
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-09-05 11:47:55 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?