Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2017-09-05 11:47:55
Message-ID: B99278AA-8FA5-4B7A-AF09-F482BDDBDED9@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 04 Apr 2017, at 14:58, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 4/4/17 8:55 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de
>>
>> I'm inclined to push this to the next CF, it seems we need a lot more
>> benchmarking here.
>>
>> No objections.
>
> This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07.

This CF has now started (well, 201709 but that’s what was meant in above), can
we reach closure on this patch in this CF?

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 2017-09-05 11:55:03 Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-09-05 11:44:35 Re: WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept