Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL

From: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date: 2018-03-08 07:46:36
Message-ID: CAKcux6=JgNap_oYmyPwhqSmCmCiLtz=in-Zfww=YUr4jWKKc2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> New patches attached, fixing all 3 of the issues you reported:
>

Thanks. new patches applied cleanly on head and fixing all reported issue.

Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Gould 2018-03-08 08:11:34 Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-03-08 07:45:30 Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping