Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Date: 2018-03-08 19:34:38
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZpQUsHRi_y+CHMwfqFhb6ZuW-47L+S=S5K349PxUDr5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> New patches attached, fixing all 3 of the issues you reported:
>
> Thanks. new patches applied cleanly on head and fixing all reported issue.

Great. Committed 0001. Are you planning any further testing of this
patch series?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-03-08 19:58:10 Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-08 19:25:59 Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key