Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey

From: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey
Date: 2020-05-13 16:02:42
Message-ID: CAKU4AWpFmE8DLiFxGrE4SD=5+Semj7o_-pWuHxVq8PuxRdMWxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ashutosh:

All your suggestions are followed except the UNION ALL one. I replied the
reason
below. For the suggestions about partitioned table, looks lot of cases to
handle, so
I summarize/enrich your idea in README and email thread, we can continue
to talk about that.

>> +
>> + foreach(lc, unionrel->reltarget->exprs)
>> + {
>> + exprs = lappend(exprs, lfirst(lc));
>> + colnos = lappend_int(colnos, i);
>> + i++;
>> + }
>>
>> This should be only possible when it's not UNION ALL. We should add some
>> assert
>> or protection for that.
>>
>
> OK, actually I called this function in generate_union_paths. which handle
> UNION case only. I will add the Assert anyway.
>
>

Finally I found I have to add one more parameter to
populate_unionrel_uniquekeys, and
the only usage of that parameter is used to Assert, so I didn't do that at
last.

>
>> +
>> + /* Fast path */
>> + if (innerrel->uniquekeys == NIL || outerrel->uniquekeys == NIL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + outer_is_onerow = relation_is_onerow(outerrel);
>> + inner_is_onerow = relation_is_onerow(innerrel);
>> +
>> + outerrel_ukey_ctx = initililze_uniquecontext_for_joinrel(joinrel,
>> outerrel);
>> + innerrel_ukey_ctx = initililze_uniquecontext_for_joinrel(joinrel,
>> innerrel);
>> +
>> + clause_list = gather_mergeable_joinclauses(joinrel, outerrel,
>> innerrel,
>> + restrictlist, jointype);
>>
>> Something similar happens in select_mergejoin_clauses().
>
>
> I didn't realized this before. I will refactor this code accordingly if
> necessary
> after reading that.
>
>

I reused select_mergejoin_clauses and removed the duplicated code in
uniquekeys.c
in v8.

At least from the
>> first reading of this patch, I get an impression that all these functions
>> which
>> are going through clause lists and index lists should be merged into other
>> functions which go through these lists hunting for some information
>> useful to
>> the optimizer.
>>
> +
>> +
>> + if (innerrel_keeps_unique(root, outerrel, innerrel, clause_list,
>> false))
>> + {
>> + foreach(lc, innerrel_ukey_ctx)
>> + {
>> + UniqueKeyContext ctx = (UniqueKeyContext)lfirst(lc);
>> + if (!list_is_subset(ctx->uniquekey->exprs,
>> joinrel->reltarget->exprs))
>> + {
>> + /* The UniqueKey on baserel is not useful on the joinrel
>> */
>>
>> A joining relation need not be a base rel always, it could be a join rel
>> as
>> well.
>>
>
> good catch.
>

Fixed.

>
>
>>
>> + ctx->useful = false;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + if ((jointype == JOIN_LEFT || jointype == JOIN_FULL) &&
>> !ctx->uniquekey->multi_nullvals)
>> + {
>> + /* Change the multi_nullvals to true at this case */
>>
>> Need a comment explaining this. Generally, I feel, this and other
>> functions in
>> this file need good comments explaining the logic esp. "why" instead of
>> "what".
>
>
> Exactly.
>

Done in v8.

>> Will continue reviewing your new set of patches as time permits.
>>
>
> Thank you! Actually there is no big difference between v6 and v7
> regarding the
> UniqueKey part except 2 bug fix. However v7 has some more documents,
> comments improvement and code refactor/split, which may be helpful
> for review. You may try v7 next time if v8 has not come yet:)
>
>
v8 has come :)

Best Regards
Andy Fan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-05-13 16:04:40 Re: Add "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to default flags
Previous Message Andy Fan 2020-05-13 15:48:25 Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey