From: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Nepali Snowball dictionary |
Date: | 2018-02-19 21:01:30 |
Message-ID: | CAKNkYnzPU2WdjzjJaBUx9hF4ULtN6gm05t1t1M50YfW7DaPW=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for your answer!
2018-02-19 18:43 GMT+03:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> We are not the upstream for the snowball stuff, and lack the expertise
> to decide whether proposed changes are any good. To get anything
> changed there, you'd have to get it approved by the snowball group.
>
> As best I know, the original list
> http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/listinfo/snowball-discuss
> is moribund, but there's a fork at
> http://snowballstem.org
> that has at least some activity.
From the original list it seems that http://snowballstem.org is
frozen. But development work continues at
https://github.com/snowballstem by other people.
I'll try to send them a pull request.
> Probably the first step ought to involve syncing our copy with the
> current state of that upstream, something that's not been done in a
> very long time :-(
I think I will try to sync snowball dictionaries with snowballstem.org
algorithms, it may be useful. Or maybe it is better to sync with the
github repository. I don't aware how they differ yet, though.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2018-02-19 21:50:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-02-19 20:45:31 | Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables |