Re: [PROPOSAL] Nepali Snowball dictionary

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Nepali Snowball dictionary
Date: 2018-02-19 15:43:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Is it appropriate to add new snowball dictionaries? I'm not sure about
> policy of including new snowball dictionaries.

We are not the upstream for the snowball stuff, and lack the expertise
to decide whether proposed changes are any good. To get anything
changed there, you'd have to get it approved by the snowball group.

As best I know, the original list
is moribund, but there's a fork at
that has at least some activity.

Probably the first step ought to involve syncing our copy with the
current state of that upstream, something that's not been done in a
very long time :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-02-19 15:58:57 Re: NEXT VALUE FOR sequence
Previous Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2018-02-19 14:38:54 Re: autovacuum: change priority of the vacuumed tables