Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-07 02:42:53
Message-ID: CAKJS1f_ociz=PvXR-dMJujGHt8Gzt5t0T4xSZTsr+zAQ90ROeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 April 2018 at 13:31, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe the best solution is to pull those tests out of
> partition_prune.sql then create partition_prune_hash and just have an
> alternative .out file with the partitions which match on bigendian
> machines.

Here's 1 of 2. I thought it was best to get the buildfarm green again
as soon as possible.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Remove-HASH-partition-pruning-tests.patch application/octet-stream 9.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-07 03:00:10 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 02:26:25 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning