Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-07 03:00:10
Message-ID: 20180407030010.rsvl5cnhaati5p7g@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-04-07 14:42:53 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 7 April 2018 at 13:31, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Maybe the best solution is to pull those tests out of
> > partition_prune.sql then create partition_prune_hash and just have an
> > alternative .out file with the partitions which match on bigendian
> > machines.
>
> Here's 1 of 2. I thought it was best to get the buildfarm green again
> as soon as possible.

Do you have an estimate how long it'll take you to produce patch 2? It'd
be cool to get this covered again soon. If you don't have access to a
big endian machine, we can construct the output from the buildfarm... So
pulling the tests out would be the only "urgent" thing, I can go on from
there.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-04-07 03:03:06 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 02:42:53 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning