Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Krzysztof Nienartowicz <krzysztof(dot)nienartowicz(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables
Date: 2018-10-22 22:36:19
Message-ID: CAKJS1f_cbMcgZG1ZZZyHY07uSgdST2RFXz66Hrxmq_4CYoJvuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 October 2018 at 23:04, Krzysztof Nienartowicz
<krzysztof(dot)nienartowicz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We see quite prohibitive 5-6x slowdown with native partitioning on in
> comparison to trigger based in PG9.5.
> This is clearly visible with highly parallel inserts (Can share
> flamediagrams comparing the two).

Does the 0001 patch here fix the problem? I imagined that it would be
the locking of all partitions that would have killed the performance.

> This basically excludes native partitioning from being used by us. Do you
> think your changes could be backported to PG10? - we checked and this would
> need quite a number of changes but given the weight of this change maybe it
> could be considered?

It's very unlikely to happen, especially so with the 0002 patch, which
I've so far just attached as a demonstration of where the performance
could end up.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-22 22:47:30 Re: Multiple Wait Events for extensions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-10-22 22:15:38 Re: pgsql: Avoid duplicate XIDs at recovery when building initial snapshot