Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables)

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables)
Date: 2018-06-27 22:18:44
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9H56xnnh=mpBcBNd3G2fnndqftbVq6NuL9aOHFwkV4hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 June 2018 at 09:01, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Another angle is that we're already in beta3 and there may be concerns
> about altering catalog definition this late in the cycle. Anybody?
> Maybe psql can just match tgisinternal triggers by name, and if one
> match occurs then we assume it's a clone that should be listed as a
> partition trigger.

Are catversion bumps really a huge problem in beta? Looks like there
were quite a few during the v10 cycle.

$ git log REL_10_BETA2..REL_10_BETA3 --oneline --
src\include\catalog\catversion.h | wc -l
1

$ git log REL_10_BETA1..REL_10_BETA2 --oneline --
src\include\catalog\catversion.h | wc -l
9

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-06-27 22:21:49 Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables)
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2018-06-27 22:16:52 Capitalization of the name OpenSSL